Christians
and Social Justice
There is no city on earth quite like
Washington DC, steeped as it is in raw politics and enormous social,
political, military, intellectual and economic power. I first
visited the city in the aftermath of the Watergate scandal (and the
hotel of the same name) and people in Christian circles were still
asking how the former President of the United States of America acted
the way he did, how he managed to abuse his position and the ends to
which people will go to secure and retain power.
The second thing I noticed was the
impact of the event on Christian America. From the 1960s the office
of President had been linked to a growing sense of “civic
religion” and association of “God” with
decision-making by the Executive. After the disillusionment of the
fall of Nixon people I met were talking about a new Christian “right”
and the polarization of people along religious lines as well as
political ones. The debate about the role of Christians in politics
has raged for years.
One of the places I visited was the
New York
Avenue Presbyterian Church, the erstwhile home church of the Reverend
Peter Marshall. The
story of Peter Marshall had touched the hearts and minds of millions
of people. Written by his wife, Catherine, “A Man Called
Peter” (later made into a motion picture), it described how a
poor Scottish immigrant became chaplain of the United States Senate
and one of the most revered men in America. For a number of years he
served at New York Avenue. Today the church is a regular
denominational entity with a strong Biblical vision and purpose. In
earlier times, however, its pastor had enormous power behind the
scenes to touch the lives of decision makers for Christ. Marshall
believed Christians needed to be involved outside of the sanctuary,
to influence the nation for God. He saw the role of the church in
political life as consistent with the message of the Gospel. Whether
in America or Australia, that truth remains valid today.
Arresting the moral drift
Christians are
increasingly expressing concerned about the moral drift of nations
previously identified with Christian heritages. Many are frustrated
about the secularization or Christian institutions and imposition of
political correctness that indirectly elevates non-Christian faiths
and world views while allowing Christian values to be maligned. They
are concerned because they do not know what they can do personally
and corporately. The roles of the pastor, the local church, the
individual Christian in a non-Christian, postmodern society are
subject of ongoing debate. If we are to be relevant, as believers in
our modern world, we need to understand our mandate from God and how
to exercise it in a Biblical way in the communities in which we live.
Wherever they can, Christians need to get involved unashamedly in
politic processes, while recognizing that the nation will never be a
substitute for the Kingdom of God. Christian men and women should
have a say, to counter the natural inclination of society to
godlessness, to uphold righteous living and for the sake of the next
generation.
Societies
occasionally break down, decay, and many disappear because of moral
vacuums and spiritual bankruptcy. When people of conscience cease to
be involved, other values become entrenched as substitutes. As a
result of an abdication from social responsibility on the part of the
major denominations, few churches today have a role in shaping our
national policies. Those that seek to do so are labeled
“fundamentalist” or extremist by the media and detractors
claim they have no place in the fabric of life outside church
buildings.
The opinions of
non-Christians should not stop us from doing what is right. Look at
what is happening. Divorce rates in recent decades have been the
highest in our history. Abortion is out of control. AIDS, sexually
transmitted diseases are on the increase. Drug, petrol and alcohol
abuse rob our communities of valuable lives. Almost every form of
sexual perversion is tolerated, or if not tolerated practiced on a
widespread basis. Do we really think we should only be involved in
“spiritual matters”, while the environment in which we
are children and living is becoming morally polluted? And since when
has life outside of the church not been “spiritual”
enough for us to get involved and make a difference? If our theology
is ecclesio-centric (inwardly focused on church structures) it is not
thoroughly Biblical. Over time, we have allowed non-Christian and
anti-Christian agendas to side-line us, close our mouths and lock us
up in our sanctuaries. Christians need to be involved in the
political process in order to provide a brake against the moral slide
and model godly behaviour in the community. If we fail to do so,
others will move into the driver’s seat and the slide will
continue.
Jesus the role model
Soon after
commencing his public ministry Jesus proclaimed:
The spirit of the Lord is upon me,
because he has anointed me to preach the Gospel to the poor; he has
sent me to heal the broken-hearted, to preach deliverance to the
captives and recovering of sight to the blind, and to set at liberty
them that are bruised (Luke 4:18)
Jesus is our
role model. I passionately believe Christians should be involved in
processes that impact official responses to poverty, hunger, vulture
capitalism, sexual oppression, the unequal distribution of wealth and
institutionalized injustice. Christians need to stand up for moral
standards, in the face of increasing visibility of amoral people in
decision-making positions affecting education and health. Christians
need to inform themselves about environmental issues, genetic
engineering and providing solutions to growing problems of
homelessness, alienation and youth and child suicide. Christians can
teach society how to treat people with mental and physical
disabilities with dignity, not pity or ridicule. Christians need to
identify where Government solutions are merely band-aids that do not
provide durable solutions.
Biblical
Christians are able to have Biblical social justice responses to
economic structures that oppress the poor, uneducated and otherwise
socially disadvantaged and marginalized. These are all issues on
which Christ challenged the people of his day, not only leaders but
all who heard him.
Those who suffer
injustice often long for God to reach out to them and assure them
that the evil present in the world is not omnipotent, but that He is
still in ultimate control.
Some Christians
baulk at words like “oppressed”, “social justice”
and “distribution of wealth” as calls to action, as
though the terms are synonymous with liberal theology, Marxism and
other world views that are inimical to evangelical tradition and
values. It is true that some Christians involved in national social
movements are not evangelical. I have met activists and lobbyists
whose theological positions put them so far to the left of the
political continuum that they are off the chart ideologically. Their
belief systems are predicated on humanism and secularism, not the New
Testament. They refer to the Gospel in liberal terms. They bear the
name “Christian” but do not own Christ except as a
fellow-social activist.
On the other
hand, why should the unbelief of some get in the way of Christianity
in action? Jesus never baulked at taking to task corrupt leadership,
injustice, the accumulation of riches by oppressors, the plight of
the poor and the need for Christian love to be exercised in the
context of accountability before God
and man and for Christians to set the example in shaping society.
True Christians should never be neutral or complacent about people
suffering injustice; if we are able to do so, we should be in the
forefront demanding redress for them.
What does the
Bible teach about government and politics? Paul taught in Romans
13:6-7 that government is established by God for the promotion of
good and the restraint of evil. In I Timothy 2:1-2 he called on
Christians to pray for their leaders. Christians ought to pray that
people who hold positions of authority be guided by God and include
those who are indwelt by the Holy Spirit and committed to the
authority of the Bible.
We believe that
all men and women are made in the image of God and have an inherent
right to develop their potential. When they suffer we all suffer.
The church is called on the provide for those in need, especially
fellow-Christians (Galatians 6:10).
No limits
If the church fails to get involved
and incarnate the person of Jesus in its responses to the needs of
the world, it will run the risk of becoming spiritually and
ecclesiastically narcissistic. Let me explain.
Narcissus
was a figure of Greek and Roman mythology, who loved himself dearly.
One day he came to a pool of water and stooped down to drink. As he
did so, he saw the reflection of his image in the water. He gazed
with admiration at the bright eyes, locks of hair, rounded cheeks and
ivory neck. He could not tear himself away and lost all thought of
food. Eventually he pined away and died. When the nymphs came to
look for him his body was nowhere to be found; in its place was a
flower, purple within and surrounded with white leaves, which bears
the name and preserves the memory of Narcissus.
If we only focus
on church members, their welfare, marriages, community needs, worship
and music styles, membership rights and obligations, buildings and
programs, we will become so self-centered that we will not notice the
world passing us by. We may even pine away to nothing, leaving only
a token of our have passed this way.
Alternatively,
we can pray and plan to make a difference. If any group in our
society has the challenge and power to become revolutionary it is the
people of God.
I have found
that several factors limit the effectiveness of Christians in the
political arena.
The first is the
failure of believers to support Christians who run for office. To
laud the notion of positioning Christian influence in politics and
decision-making, then not to support such people electorally is
hypocritical and deceptive, not to say disappointing.
The second is to
assume that just because a person claims to be a Christian they
should garner voter support. There are occasions on which Christians
belong to opposing political parties and do not promote good policy.
The principle of looking for fruit remains valid.
The third
debilitating factor is the propensity in many nations to align
particular parties with Christian teaching, thus excluding
alternative parties and alienating their supporters. I have come to
realize that most parties are supported by some Christians and count
genuine Christians in their ranks. Just as there is no perfect
church, there is no perfect political organization. As Christians we
need to be wise and not allow ourselves to be beguiled by rhetoric
into taking sides unduly, to the detriment of effective witness and
the capacity to make a contribution to the larger debate.
There is another
way: Christians who feel called to do so ought to prepare
assiduously for office and offer viable, strong, reasoned grounds for
broad church support, without being swayed by compromise on the one
hand and the politics of hate on the other. If Christians are to
make a difference, they must be different. From this position of
moral strength they will be able to convince others about where
change is needed, rather than lapse into pragmatism and end up
looking like all the other players, supporting programs and policies
that do more harm than good or that neutralize the impact of genuine
reform.
Christian social
involvement must remain focused and centred on truth, if it is not to
be high-jacked by the agendas of godless secular humanism in its many
forms, that have a form of correctness but deny the sovereignty of
God and the centrality of Christ. Such philosophies are antithetical
to Christianity. Believers have a mandate to be involved in building
the community with integrity, simplicity, equity, moral discipline
and godly care for others, especially the weak. One effective way to
do this is for people who know Christ and experience the presence of
a Holy God to participate in policy formulation and the legislative
process.
Finally,
politics is a human institution. Christianity is a work of the Holy
Spirit. Only the power of God can effectively transform human hearts
for good. Morality can be encouraged by right-thinking government,
but upright living can never be legislated by human institutions.
Prohibition alone does not produce lasting change. Nor, for that
matter, does institutional religious moulding. Positive change that
is both fundamental and practical is the work of the Holy Spirit
alone.